data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59989/599898cc7ac05c21dded2f385cf18799cafa71b8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f068c/f068c7224629a0b2fcd20e364d04cf8b43c6e8ec" alt=""
Well, I guess that's one way to get over a devastating defeat. And isn't it amazing what people find on the internet?
Double Extra Point has moved!
You should be automatically redirected in 5 seconds. If not, visit
www.doubleextrapoint.com
and update your bookmarks.
The graph illustrates the interaction between the explosive plays produced by Nebraska’s offense and those given up by its defense in 2006. From an offensive standpoint you have to be pleased with what the graph shows. The Nebraska “O” has produced 88 explosive plays on the season, or just under 10 per game. That is a vast improvement over the numbers put up just a year ago. In 2005, the Huskers offense had only 61 explosive plays or slightly over 5 per contest. I think most Husker fans would agree that the offense is vastly improved over last year. Much of this improvement can be traced to an enhanced running game and the development of a big play receiver in Maurice Purify.Explosive Plays (Click to Enlarge)
“They were able to get away with this for several reasons. First, the Huskers led the nation in sacks with 50 and also had 140 tackles for loss. In addition, the 2005 defense was able to clamp down in the Red Zone, and prevent teams from scoring from this area of the field. Lastly, they benefited from strong special teams play. Nebraska blocked several field goals, including two potential game winners versus Pitt. Moreover, the Huskers relied on punter Sam Koch to flip the field and bury opponents in negative field position situations.”The Blackshirts are way behind the 2005 pace in both sacks and tackles for loss. In addition, the special teams have become less than special. As a result, I continue to have concerns about our defense and its inclination to give up explosive plays. Even with an improved offense, we still don’t protect the QB well enough to get involved in a shootout. This is especially worrisome given the weapons that Missouri brings to Lincoln. If we thought the spread attack of Oklahoma State created match up problems, just wait until the Chase Daniel-led Tiger attack takes the field on Saturday.
Rank | Team | Delta |
---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State | -- |
2 | Michigan | -- |
3 | West Virginia | ![]() |
4 | Tennessee | ![]() |
5 | Florida | ![]() |
6 | Texas | ![]() |
7 | Louisville | -- |
8 | California | ![]() |
9 | Auburn | ![]() |
10 | Southern Cal | ![]() |
11 | Notre Dame | ![]() |
12 | Arkansas | ![]() |
13 | LSU | ![]() |
14 | Boston College | ![]() |
15 | Wisconsin | ![]() |
16 | Rutgers | ![]() |
17 | Boise State | ![]() |
18 | Oklahoma | ![]() |
19 | Clemson | ![]() |
20 | Texas A&M | ![]() |
21 | Georgia Tech | ![]() |
22 | Oregon | ![]() |
23 | Wake Forest | ![]() |
24 | Virginia Tech | ![]() |
25 | Missouri | ![]() |
“Because of the noise and everything, I can feel the vibrations in my body. I can't hear the people, but I can see the people when they clap. I can see that, and it makes me get more motivated and play better.”Obviously Husker fans will be reminded of former defensive tackle Kenny Walker who lettered for Nebraska during the 1989-1990 seasons. One of my greatest Nebraska memories was senior day 1990 when the Memorial Stadium crowd saluted Walker with arms outstretched and hands waving signifying the “deaf clap”. I still get chills now, just thinking about it.
"He’s really kind of separated himself I think, the way that he’s played. He’s made a lot of big plays the last three weeks."I agree that BJax has made some tough runs, as well as shown the ability to catch the ball out of the backfield. However, weren’t we saying the same thing about Marlon Lucky just a few weeks ago?
Number of Carries by Game (Click to enlarge)
We have the luxury of four talented I-Backs and a coaching staff that has done a tremendous job of spreading the ball around. Most importantly, the players still seem to be comfortable with the system:Rushing Yards by Game (Click to enlarge)
"Like Coach (Randy) Jordan says, it’s still a running back by committee," Brandon Jackson said. “Whoever has the momentum, he says he’ll leave him in"So why then does the media have an unrelenting need to seek clarification about which back sits atop the depth chart? Once again the Nebraska press is asking the wrong damn questions.
“I didn't go out or nothing. I just sat in my room. I didn't watch ESPN or nothin'. Actually I watched Law and Order and then I went to sleep.”Well, He Was Supafly on That Day: The all-time Oklahoma State record for receiving yards in a game is held by one Curtis Mayfield (no, not that one). Mayfield torched Nebraska for 209 yards receiving in 1989. OSU’s QB in that game was Mike Gundy.
“A couple of schematic issues with both of these teams: one is the absurd complexity of Bill Callahan's playbook, which is like a parody of a playbook, with incomprehensible commands from another dimension, and the crazy motion that never seems to lead to a mismatch or even confusion from the defense, which pretty much just watches like Indiana Jones before he unceremoniously shoots the psyched-up sword-wielding turban guy in the market in Raiders of the Lost Ark. Look, over here! A fullback - in the slot! No - whoosh! - he actually is a fullback! Gotcha! This is complexity for the sake of complexity and not worth much.”Like I mentioned, I'm buried this week under an avalanche of undergraduate student papers. I'm going to try and kick out an OSU preview if I find time. Give me some feedback - does anybody read them or find them worthwhile? I like doing them, but they certainly take some efforting on my part.
Rank | Team | Delta |
---|---|---|
1 | Ohio State | -- |
2 | Michigan | -- |
3 | Southern Cal | ![]() |
4 | West Virginia | ![]() |
5 | Tennessee | -- |
6 | Florida | -- |
7 | Louisville | ![]() |
8 | Texas | ![]() |
9 | California | ![]() |
10 | Auburn | -- |
11 | Clemson | -- |
12 | Notre Dame | ![]() |
13 | Arkansas | ![]() |
14 | LSU | ![]() |
15 | Rutgers | ![]() |
16 | Boise State | ![]() |
17 | Wisconsin | ![]() |
18 | Texas A&M | ![]() |
19 | Missouri | ![]() |
20 | Boston College | ![]() |
21 | Nebraska | ![]() |
22 | Oklahoma | ![]() |
23 | Oregon | ![]() |
24 | Georgia Tech | ![]() |
25 | Wake Forest | ![]() |